The initial find true evidence is to look for the keywords that are suitable to develop questions that are required. It helps to find out the answers quickly. Moreover, it helps to identify problems faced by the caregivers during their Medicare practices. For example, if the question is regarding the attachment of the risk factors for the adults or the care settings, the keywords could be Medicare, injury, care facilities and emergency injury management. The focus must be on the accurate concept when the medical terms are used. It must be well recognized and need to depict an overall process (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). For example- the word Intervention is used to demonstrate the entire activities that are conducted for the healthcare development of a patient. In addition, another keyword that may include is Adult Health Care. It generally depicts the overall health developmental process of an adult in a healthcare home. Some related keywords related to adult health care are medication for the adults and adult health developmental equipment. Child healthcare can be another keyword and interventional keyow2rd for childe healthcare can be baby care, baby health care, and baby health. For the urinary tract infections associated with Foley catheter, the keywords like urinary tract, infections, Foley catheter will be used. The effectiveness of using medical keywords are:
Out of these three types of database systematic review database is suitable for the Medicare services. It has integrity that quickly stores and analyzes any difficult medical term. Psychotherapy Evidence Base database is the most updated database to store the medical information for the patients. It generally contains over 33000 records regarding the trials, patient review, treatment review and clinical informative guideline (Konno & Makimoto, 2014). The database related to the nursing practice, especially associated with urinary tract infections associated with Foley catheter will be helpful to search proper research article.
Strategic question for article search:
What is the appropriate use of Foley catheter for urinary tract infections and what are the benefits and drawbacks of the use of Foley catheter for urinary tract infections?
The strategies must be aligned with the selected database system. The strategy must be developed through the process as follows:
By following these steps a well-developed strategy can be made. Boolean operators must be used to include or exclude the concept. It is necessary to be careful about the inappropriate spelling of words. The keywords must be combined accordingly so that it can be a meaningful concept. It is the most necessary task to develop an appropriate strategy (Unimelb, 2018).
The steps to develop appropriate strategy are:
Hence, their following steps are to be followed to develop an effective research strategy for the medical students (Poe & White, 2010).
The level, validity, and quality of the evidence can be gathered from various review systems. Systematic review system, a meta-analysis review system, and meta-synthesis are the most suitable types of review systems by which the level, validity, and quality of the record can be identified (Newman, 2006).
Systematic review: Systematic review database generally analyzes and evaluates the research questions and list the source information. The documents that the systematic review provides are comprehensive, rigorous and transparent. The healthcare evidence-based practitioners rely much on the systematic review. It provides them technically advanced research results and methodological accurate. Moreover, the Systematic review is interchangeable. Thus, information can be manipulated (Saberi, 2016).
The features of systematic review system are :
Meta-analysis review: The Meta-analysis review system is integrated with the effective Medicare decision making power. It combines all the study results and increases the power of probability to analyze and discuss the information (Huls et al., 2018).
The key features of the meta-analysis review are :
Meta-Synthesis review: Meta-synthesis review is a qualitative research base database that records information collecting from rich and narrative resources. It interprets data instead of aggregating this. Moreover, it stores the information with scientific techniques (Mabbott, 2013).
The key features of meta-synthesis review are :
After analyzing the records and strategy it is necessary to keep a record of the strategy and results.
The ways to keep the record are
References
Buccheri, R., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical Appraisal Tools and Reporting Guidelines for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews On Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(6), 463-472.
Cutcliffe, J., & Ward, M. (2014). Critiquing nursing research. Luton: Andrews UK.
Flemming, K. (2007). The synthesis of qualitative research and evidence-based nursing. Evidence-Based Nursing, 10(3), pp.68-71.
Huls, H., Abdulahad, S., Mackus, M., van de Loo, A., Roehrs, T., Roth, T., & Verster, J. (2018). Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of Clinical Trials for Insomnia. Journal Of Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 206.
Konno, R., & Makimoto, K. (2014). A systematic review of the best pain assessment strategies for people with dementia. International Journal Of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 12(3), 169.
Mabbott, I. (2013). The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence – Seventh editionThe Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence – Seventh edition. Nursing Standard, 27(31), 30-30.
Newman, M. (2006). Helping practitioners understand the contribution of qualitative research to evidence-based practice. Evidence-Based Nursing, 9(1), pp.4-7.
Philbrick, V. (2013). Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Model and Guidelines, 2nd Edition. AORN Journal, 97(1), 157-158.
Poe, S. & White, K. (2010). John Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
Saberi, M. (2016). Choosing the Best Glasses for Clinical Practice: Evidence- Based Medicine Versus Other Alternative Approaches. Annals Of Anesthesiology And Critical Care, 1(1).
Twycross, A. (2011). Using research findings in nursing practice. Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(3), pp.63-63.
Unimelb. (2018). LibGuides: Systematic Reviews: Tab 5: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Retrieved from https://unimelb.libguides.com/c.php?g=492361&p=3368110
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download