Adverse Event Resulting In Patient Death: Clinical Scenario Description

Clinical scenario description

In this assignment, the clinical scenario that I will be discussing about my personal experience will be of a 3 year old child having massive abdominal tumour and his care process. At first, the parents were hesitating to admit the patient at hospital and let him undergo harsh medical treatment. However, later they decided to allow the healthcare professionals to start treatment for their child. I was a part of the nursing team that cared for the child in intensive care unit. Within few days of care we all were attached to the child and his parent seemed relieved watching their child’s improved health condition. Eventually the child faced several rounds of rigorous chemotherapy and endured numerous surgeries. We were 6 registered nurses involved in the care process, however one of the nurse in our team was attached to the child and always used to take care related initiatives for the child. After 4 months of rigorous medical treatment the doctors declared the child cancer free and I saw the relief on the parents face after they heard the news. However, the doctors recommended that the patient should undergo the last step of chemotherapy prior to discharge that the parent agreed due to the commendable effort of the healthcare facility to save their child. On the day of chemotherapy, the doctors asked us to prepare the intravenous bag of sodium chloride and the nurse, who was attached to the child took the responsibility of this work. However, while preparing for the intravenous bag, the nurse abruptly filled the intravenous bag with more than 20 times of the recommended dose of sodium chloride that make the child admitted to the ICU section and after being on the life support for 3 hours, the child died.

	January	February	March	April Save Time On Research and Writing Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper. Get My Paper	May	June	July	August
Identification of abdominal tumour
Approval for treatment
Medication process
Death of the child
Legal obligations taken on the nurse
Judgment taken in this case

In a literature review regarding the effect of patients death on healthcare staff it was determined that due to the level of attachment and care involved in a nursing profession, they are the most affected nursing profession after the death of their patient (Kable, Kelly & Adams, 2018). In this clinical scenario also, the nurse, who was attached to the child, faced trauma as the entire healthcare department blamed her for the death of the patient. The healthcare facility carried out an investigation regarding the incident however, she was not allowed to take part in that as she was suspended on the same day of incidence. These were the short term impact of the incident as she was blamed, isolated and suspended from her duties without any clarification from her side (Santomauro, Kalkman & Dekker, 2014). She was in shock after the death of the children however the investigation did not noticed her care for the patient. The long term impacts were cancellation of her nursing license that ruined her professional life, made her suffer from depression and became reason for her suicidal nature (Skourti & Pavlakis, 2017; Stelmaschuk, 2017). After struggling with discrimination, being judged, isolated and blamed for one year, she committed suicide in her apartment. Therefore, the impact of the patient’s death was the death of the nurse herself (MacLeod, 2014; Carrillo et al., 2016).

Clinical scenario timeline

After this adverse event, all the staff involved in the last day of chemotherapy were asked to provide their statement related to the incident inform of the senior clinicians and unit managers. However, while discussing about the nurse involved, who was working in the facility for 4 long years did not mentioned about her strengths and the devotion she used to invest in care process of each patient (Scott, Hirschinger & Cox, 2008). The unit managers and senior clinicians who worked with that nurse previously in several case should supported the nurse, instead of suspending her and should have included her in the care process. As McCay and Wu (2012) mentions that it is important for the employees to support each other in adverse situations otherwise the effect of an adverse situation can affect one of them drastically to the extent of suicidal behaviors, which could be observed in this case (Panella et al., 2015). Further the managers and senior staff should be supportive and reliable so that the staff involved in the situation can describe the event honestly to them without having any fear. However, in this case, the senior staff not only ask any clarification from the nurse, but also suspended her from the facility making her suffer from depression (Mira et al., 2015).

Healthcare facility is a process that involved numerous amount of interfaces and handoffs that seeks a collaboration and combination of employees with various level of occupational and educational level (Burlison et al., 2016). Sirriyeh et al. (2010) also mentions that in a healthcare facility, a patient faces more than 50 employee everyday as care is a process of combination. Therefore, starting from happiness to stressful situations, they should stick together so that no adverse situation can affect their mental peace. However, in this clinical scenario, the adverse event affected the team unity and spirit that changed the team dynamics, trust and compatibility among the nursing staff (Sirriyeh et al., 2010). Instead of defending the nurse accused for the event, other nursing professionals also started isolating her from their group that affected the mental health of the nurse leading to depression and suicidal tendency (Burlison et al., 2016).

It should be determined that reporting procedure is important for healthcare facilities to maintain their care service quality and accountability depending on which, the revenue of the care facility increases or decreases (Van Gerven et al., 2014). There are two type of reporting system such as direct reporting which is done by the care facility and indirect reporting or concerns and complaints which is done by the first victims of the event or the families. In this case, the Australian healthcare rules determine that the healthcare facilities should bear facilities using which they can carry out internal reporting and investigation which is unbiased, notifiable and honest. Further the legislations also determine that clinical governance of the healthcare should be transparent, accountable, and fair and should give priority to the adverse event reporting and investigation (Skourti & Pavlakis, 2017). Moreover, the reporting process is consisting of requirements, complying which can provide the healthcare organization to lead the investigation process. External investigation can also involve the healthcare facility investigation team as joint investigation process. As well as, if the healthcare facility allows, the professionals involved or accused of adverse event can also take part in the investigation process. As per the data of Scott et al. (2009) and Scott, Hirschinger and Cox (2008) the serious incident reporting requirements are the permission of Patient Safety Surveillance Unit or PSSU, primary investigation report conducted by the healthcare facility and especially the Risk management and Safety Quality and Performance team (Ullström et al., 2014; Mira et al., 2015). Further, the external investigation is dependent on the verdict of the healthcare department authorities as depending on the reliability, honesty and trustworthiness of the report of the internal reporting, the commencement of external reporting depends (Wu, 2000).

Short term and long term impact of clinical situation

Medication error is one of the most important errors in healthcare profession that are causing millions of death worldwide nowadays. Increased responsibility, strict working hours and tireless efforts are the reasons due to which nursing professionals face burn outs that affect their reasoning ability (Seys et al., 2013; Jones & Treiber, 2012). In such situation they commit mistakes that are harmful for their patients as well as their profession (Chu, 2018). However, at this time point they need tremendous collegiate and institutional support to overcome the guilt of their fault. The healthcare organizations should provide them a chance to describe their point of view about the incident and should seek their clarification (Denham, 2007; Harrison wet al., 2015). Further they should be allowed to take part in the investigation process so that they can also understand the mistake they did in the care process (Kim et al., 2017). Further, the healthcare professionals involved in such event should be provided with clinical supervision so that someone can assist them in their care process (Van Gerven et al., 2014; Burlison et al., 2016).

The second victims can also take part in the prevention of such events by sharing their experience of such events to the future healthcare professionals or nurses. This will help them future nurses to learn from the mistakes of the second victim and they will be determined to help the patients with complete concentration (Skourti & Pavlakis, 2017). Further, the second victim can also take part in the identification and investigation process that will help her to regain her confidence and find the reason for the death of her patient, increasing her self-esteem (Treiber & Jones, 2010).

References

Buchini, S., & Quattrin, R. (2012). Avoidable interruptions during drug administration in an intensive rehabilitation ward: improvement project. Journal of nursing management, 20(3), 326-334.

Burlison, J. D., Quillivan, R. R., Scott, S. D., Johnson, S., & Hoffman, J. M. (2016). The Effects of the Second Victim Phenomenon on Work-Related Outcomes: Connecting Self-Reported Caregiver Distress to Turnover Intentions and Absenteeism. Journal of patient safety.

Carrillo, I., Mira, J. J., Vicente, M. A., Fernandez, C., Guilabert, M., Ferrús, L., … & Pérez-Pérez, P. (2016). Design and testing of BACRA, a Web-based tool for middle managers at health care facilities to lead the search for solutions to patient safety incidents. Journal of medical Internet research, 18(9).

Chu, T. (2018). How to Immediately Support a Second Victim: An Educational Program for Leaders (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis).

Denham, C. R. (2007). TRUST: the 5 rights of the second victim. Journal of Patient Safety, 3(2), 107-119.

Harrison, R., Lawton, R., Perlo, J., Gardner, P., Armitage, G., & Shapiro, J. (2015). Emotion and coping in the aftermath of medical error: a cross-country exploration. Journal of patient safety, 11(1), 28-35.

Jones, J. H., & Treiber, L. A. (2012, October). When nurses become the “second” victim. In Nursing forum (Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 286-291).

Kable, A., Kelly, B., & Adams, J. (2018). Effects of adverse events in health care on acute care nurses in an Australian context: A qualitative study. Nursing & health sciences.

Kim, E. M., Kim, S. A., Kim, J. I., Lee, J. R., & Na, S. G. (2017). Effects of Nurse’s Second Victim Experiences on Third Victim Experiences: Multiple Mediation Effects of Second Victim Supports. Quality Improvement in Health Care, 23(2), 23-34.

MacLeod, L. (2014). ” Second victim” casualties and how physician leaders can help. Physician executive, 40(1), 8-12.

McCay, L., & Wu, A. W. (2012). Medical error: the second victim. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 73(Sup10), C146-C148.

Mira, J. J., Lorenzo, S., Carrillo, I., Ferrús, L., Pérez-Pérez, P., Iglesias, F., … & Maderuelo-Fernández, J. Á. (2015). Interventions in health organisations to reduce the impact of adverse events in second and third victims. BMC health services research, 15(1), 341.

Panella, M., Leigheb, F., Rinaldi, C., Donnarumma, C., Tozzi, Q., & Di, F. S. (2015). Defensive medicine: defensive medicine: overview of the literature. Igiene e sanita pubblica, 71(3), 335-351.

Santomauro, C. M., Kalkman, C. J., & Dekker, S. (2014). Second victims, organizational resilience and the role of hospital administration. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(5), 95.

Scott, S. D., Hirschinger, L. E., & Cox, K. R. (2008). Sharing the load. Rescuing the healer after trauma. Rn, 71(12), 38.

Scott, S. D., Hirschinger, L. E., Cox, K. R., McCoig, M., Brandt, J., & Hall, L. W. (2009). The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider “second victim” after adverse patient events. BMJ Quality & Safety, 18(5), 325-330.

Seys, D., Wu, A. W., Gerven, E. V., Vleugels, A., Euwema, M., Panella, M., … & Vanhaecht, K. (2013). Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Evaluation & the health professions, 36(2), 135-162.

Sirriyeh, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Armitage, G. (2010). Coping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals’ psychological well-being. Qual Saf Health Care, 19(6), e43-e43.

Skourti, P. K., & Pavlakis, A. (2017). The Second Victim Phenomenon: The Way Out. In Impact of Medical Errors and Malpractice on Health Economics, Quality, and Patient Safety(pp. 197-222). IGI Global.

Stelmaschuk, R. L. M. (2017). Embedding Just culture in healthcare quality assurance reviews. Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/10613/5066

Treiber, L. A., & Jones, J. H. (2010). Devastatingly human: an analysis of registered nurses’ medication error accounts. Qualitative Health Research, 20(10), 1327-1342.

Ullström, S., Sachs, M. A., Hansson, J., Øvretveit, J., & Brommels, M. (2014). Suffering in silence: a qualitative study of second victims of adverse events. BMJ Qual Saf, 23(4), 325-331.

Van Gerven, E., Seys, D., Panella, M., Sermeus, W., Euwema, M., Federico, F., … & Vanhaecht, K. (2014). Involvement of healthcare professionals in an adverse event: the role of management in supporting their work force. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine, 124(6), 313-320.

Wu, A. W. (2000). Medical error: the second victim: the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320(7237), 726.

Wu, A. W., & Steckelberg, R. C. (2012). Medical error, incident investigation and the second victim: doing better but feeling worse?