Discuss About The Developing Systemic Lessons Learn Knowledge.
The main characteristics of the QH project involve identifying, documenting as well as prioritizing of the future models which are to be incorporated in the payroll system of QH project. Engaging the potential stakeholders such as the chief information officer operating as the government official of Queensland can be helpful in getting a better insight of the present market and the future scope.
These processes will be helpful in assessing the external market with respect to the costs, benefits and the potential risks.
The project characteristics include proper decision-making to bring improvements in the payroll system. Other than this, senior leader with designated roles are also involved in the project.
This can potentially bring more accuracy, minimal manual entry of data and timeliness.
The main project characteristics include implementation of various engagement programs for their respective stakeholders, ensuring proper communications as well as change management before modifying the present business approach, managing disruptions and exploring the future opportunities of the QH payroll system.
These characteristics can possibly make the decision making process more transparent, can provide the staffs with certain advantages and will bring more stability in the proceedings of the project.
The key characteristics of this project involve distinguishing of the various cost drivers such as the ‘BAU’ cost, system enhancement cost. Investment to meet the system requirement as well as for bringing improvements in the project, identifying the tangibles benefits are also a part of the key characteristics of this project.
These aspects can be beneficial for the stakeholders as this will enable the stakeholders to assess the shortfall of the estimated funding and this will be instrumental in prioritizing the future spending.
For Project 1 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
The Chief Information officer of the Queensland government can be regarded as the owner of the project. Other than this the government officials who are involved in the project management can also be considered as the owner (Thite and Sandhu, 2014).
There might be instances where the staffs do not agree with the decision of the information officer.
In the context of the QH payroll system the various stakeholders of the project can be regarded as the designers of the project. The market analyst, risk assessment team are the potential designers considering the case of the project (Sharma, Bottom and Elfenbein, 2013).
There might raise situation of conflicts if the improvised system incurs loss in the mid-way of implementation.
The contractors of the project will be the decision-makers of the project.
There might be instances of conflict where the staffs do not abide by the decisions of the decision makers.
For Project 2 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
The senior leaders and the associated members can be regarded as the owner of this process as they are given with key responsibilities. They are liable to maintain healthy relationship with all the major stakeholders (Eden and Sedera, 2014).
A scenario of conflict might rise when the target is not achieved.
In this context, again the various stakeholders can be viewed as the designers of the process.
Conflicts might rise when the stakeholders are not given with proper progress of the project.
The various government officials who are given with the responsibility of auditing the project can be at the negotiating position.
Situations of conflicts might arise for the contractors if the project is not enough effective.
For Project 3 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
The owners of this process will be the people who will be responsible for the engagement of the stakeholder. The owners of this negotiation process will hold regular meet ups with the various stakeholders.
A situation of conflict might arise when the owners could not cope up with the requirements of the stakeholders.
The various stakeholders can be viewed as the designers of the project as their cooperation and decision should also be kept in mind during implementation of the system.
A situation of conflict might rise when the stakeholders are not satisfied with the proceedings of the project.
The team which would manage the disruptions and team responsible of maintaining the healthy communications with the stakeholders can be regarded as the contractors for this process.
Situations of conflicts might arise for the contractors when an unplanned change or disruption will occur in the project.
For Project 4 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
In context of funding the managers can be considered as the owners of the negotiation process. They are responsible for bringing significant improvements in the project.
Situation of conflict might rise when the various costs are not estimated properly.
The accounts section who will estimate the overall budget, which will monitor the different cost drivers of the project, can be considered as the negotiation position of the designers.
A situation of conflict might rise if the there is future spending are not estimated properly.
The staffs can be viewed as the contractors of the negotiation process as any discrepancies or faults in the funding can directly affect the stuffs.
The recommended negotiation strategy for the project is the structural approach of negotiation. In structural approach, an emphasis is mostly given on the means with the help of which the parties could reach at appoint of negotiation (Baarslag et al., 2014). In case of the QH health sector, if the payroll system is managed in structured manner such as if the different domains of the health service are created this can turn out to be beneficial. The structured payroll system can be considered to be beneficial for the stuffs as well as the public.
The recommended negotiation strategy for this approach is the strategic approach. If the outcome of the QH organization is strategized beforehand then the payroll system can be improved much faster and efficiently (Ting?Toomey, 2015).
The recommended approach for this project is the behavioural approach. The QH needs to ensure that in case a situation of unplanned changes or disruption arises in the project implementation phase that should not affect the potential stakeholders of the QH.
The concessional exchange approach is highly recommended for the purpose of this project. This strategy of negotiation will enable the QH organization to assess the risk beforehand (Birkeland, 2013). Such as this will allow the organization to predict the loss that the QH can incur.
The recommended negotiation method for this project is cooperative negotiation. Cooperative negotiation will enable the QH system to incorporate the best ideas of their stakeholders in order to enhance the current state of the organization (Pruitt, 2013). Communication can help in deriving the best possible strategy for the organization.
The recommended negotiation method for this project is cooperative negotiation. Cooperative negotiation will enable the QH system to incorporate the best ideas of their stakeholders in order to enhance the current state of the organization (Pruitt, 2013). Communication can help in deriving the best possible strategy for the organization.
The negotiation method that should be taken into account for this project will mainly involve researching the requirements of the market, the various issues of the stuffs (Glass, 2013). These information are necessary for the organization to carry out negotiation with the various stakeholders of the company.
The negotiation method that can be incorporated in this project is the competitive method of project negotiation as this would help in estimating the most appropriate budget for the QH payroll system. This method of negotiation will certainly help in segregating the funded as well as the unfunded components for the prescribed payroll system (Lall, 2014).
In context of the project, the preferred outcome will be to incorporate more innovative ideas to improve the present payroll system QH.
The preferred outcome of this project will be to manage the several domains of the QH in a well organised manner.
The QH have huge number of staffs. The preferred outcome of this project will be to maintain cordial relationship with the staffs. Hiring employees from different categories can beneficial for the QH.
The preferred outcome of this project will be to complete the QH project within the estimated budget. Maintaining healthy relationship with the stakeholders can also be considered as one of the desired outcome of the project.
References
Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Hendrikx, M., Dirkzwager, A. and Jonker, C., 2014. Decoupling negotiating agents to explore the space of negotiation strategies. In Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation (pp. 61-83). Springer, Tokyo.
Birkeland, S., 2013. Negotiation under possible third-party resolution. The Journal of Law and Economics, 56(2), pp.281-299.
Duffield, S. and Whitty, S.J., 2015. Developing a systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects. International journal of project management, 33(2), pp.311-324.
Eden, R. and Sedera, D., 2014. The largest admitted IT project failure in the Southern Hemisphere: a teaching case. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems: Building a Better World Through Information Systems. AISeL.
Glass, R.L., 2013. The Queensland Health Payroll Debacle. Information Systems Management, 30(1), pp.89-90.
Lall, A.S. ed., 2014. Multilateral negotiation and mediation: instruments and methods. Elsevier.
Pruitt, D.G., 2013. Negotiation behavior. Academic Press.
Sharma, S., Bottom, W.P. and Elfenbein, H.A., 2013. On the role of personality, cognitive ability, and emotional intelligence in predicting negotiation outcomes: A meta-analysis. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(4), pp.293-336.
Thite, M. and Sandhu, K., 2014. Where is My Pay? Critical Success Factors of a Payroll System–A System Life Cycle Approach. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(2).
Ting?Toomey, S., 2015. Identity negotiation theory. The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download