Discuss About The Electromyographic And Autonomic Reactions

Thomas Beatie and Queer Theory

Discuss About The Electromyographic And Autonomic Reactions.

The experience of Thomas Beatie to get impregnated with the children was not very well accepted by the society. The law of Arizona and the contemporary society was very much against the idea of a transgendered male bearing a child and claiming to be their father. The transgender experience itself is very varied across the different parts of the society. The concept of the people and the stereotypes about the transgender in the society is another hindrance in ensuring the overall development of the society (Charter et al. 2018). The queer theory relates to any experience in the society relating to the different aspects of the difference in the gender identities and the sexual desires and the sexual orientation. Thomas Beatie was a transgender with the capability of consievong because during the sexual reassignment sugury he chose to keep his female sexual organs intact. The Queer perspective is a very wide one with all the aspects have a say in the different matters relating to the development of the bodies in the society. Therefore it can be said that the idea of Thomas to make himself male along with the different sociocultural construct is defined by the society (Feldberg 2017). The social ideology regarding to the perspective of the different people in the society is based on the stereotypes prevalent about the concept of fatherhood and motherhood. The development of the ideologies in this concept is defined by the varied perspectives of the different people and the conceptions about the transgender. On the other hand the queer theory does not identify the gender identity and the roles of the person based on the gender identities. This management the case of Thomas Beatie valid in the situations he was in during the giving the birth to their children. He is very much capable of giving birth and has the right to be called by the role of his chosen identity to the child. Though the Arizona court still defines him as the mother of the children he gave birth to, it is his right to stand against the gender identity and roles in the society.

The queer theory takes him as the parent of the different children and he is the father to them though giving birth to them as despite his physical anatomy he is psychologically and physically male given the sexual reassignment surgery he underwent (Hunt 2016). The Arizona court laws still do not consider him as the father but the queer theory keeps his identity in the undefined and he is free to ascribe the roles to himself. his careful consideration regarding the accessories of his dad’s own multiethnic manliness in this entry—which instantly conveys to the surface the sentiments of servility that he connects with this specific sexual orientation personality—proposes that it is the loss of his dad which Beatie endeavors to go up against through his own melancholic sex arrangement. The different roles regarding the sexual orientation and the roles and the gender identity of the person cannot be ascertained as in the case of Beatie.

Women’s Body Building and Gender Power Dynamics

The women’s body building is not seen with the perfect ideologies as the body building is seen as the attributes of the men in the society. The case of Bev a woman who built strong and chilled body was not seen well by the different parts of the society. One of the major parts of the discourse is the image of the men and women that have been fed in the minds of the people in the society through years of acculturation. Its is a great shift in the gender power dynamics when the women start challenging the men dominance in the field of body building. As Althuserrian Ideological State Apparatus explains the ideological ideas fed into the mind of the people and the society becomes a normal and the accepted thing in the society. That is the issue with the female body building. Through years of acculturation it has been fed in the mind of the common people in the society that the male body is supposed to be strong and chiseled while the female body is supposed to have a voluptuous figure (Steinbock 2014). These ideals are so deeply fed that the very construct of a mind does not accept the idea of the female body builder who can compete with the men on their arena. It is also important to be seen that the different roles of the people in the society are the result of a number of ideological and socially accepted behaviors. The act of not finding a chiseled female body attractive has again to do with the gender and the power dynamics in the society. The men have always been made to feel as the supporters and the providers to the female in the society and the behavior of women to be stronger than them in the society cannot be accepted in the male dominant society. As the male child it always taught to look upon in certain way the gaze of the women are also varied and different in other parts of the society. The explanation of the female body being the stronger one among the male and female ideology as the male mind is supposed to at the women body in a certain ways and set their own limits regarding the behavior and other aspects in the society (Andreasson and Johansson 2014). the patriarchal ideology that has been fed in the mind of the people through years of culturing does not helping in the development of the people and ideologies so that they may be accepting of the different ideologies that have been existing in the society in this context. On the other hand the women in the society to reinforce this belief as the women who do heavy lifting and body building are seen as masculine (Felkar 2012). The deeply inculcated ideologies regarding the body types and the gender roles of the different people in the society is one of the major things that reinforces the belief of the gender based disparity in the field.

The Perfect Vagina and Gender Gaze Shift

In The Perfect Vagina the cast of the vulvas of the women are shown to the men and not women or transgender is major question that can be raised by the people belonging to the queer society. It generally shows the depth of belief that the vagina of the women are supposed to be beautiful for only the men in the society (Ohlsen, van Zoest and van Vugt 2013). This documentary in this ways negates the stance of the necessity of the beauty in the transgender and the homosexual relationships among women. The audience too is okay with the documentary showing the detail of the woman’s private organs to the men in the society but there may be a strong uproar if the audience pool consists of the lesbian women and transgender. The society is itself stigmatized by the fact that a person can find another person of the same sex attractive and there may be a major shift of gaze in the differential roles of the men and woman in the society if the cast were shown to all three genders.

The gaze would now include the opinions of the different genders and their sexual preferences and the choices in this context would also have to be valued. The gaze shift will also consist of a shocking realization to the audience who are against the same sex relationships and the transgender (Bradley, Costa and Lang 2015). The idea of the documentary is to focus on the changes and the shift and the kind of the causes are forcing the women and the girls in the society to go for such surgeries. The gender gaze is one of the important issues in the context. It is an ideological view in the contemporary society that the female body is supposed to be beautiful to the eyes of the men. In this context if the opinion of the women are taken it ascertains the importance of the sexual relations of the same sex couples which the society still chooses to negate. The change in gaze will also mean that the focus will shift from the getting through of the main idea of the documentary to the ascribing the acceptance of the same sex marriages in the society. The major issues in the gaze shift is also the fact that the women who are the target audience of the documentary (Soussignan et al. 2013). The major ideological issues occur due to the gaze shift as it will turn the documentary from the informative paradigm to the area of gender identity and the queer discourse. The inclusion however will however take into account the different perception of the society. the overall need of the surgery may be mitigated if the opinion may be taken from the female respondent as well as they may be more compassionate about the issue and understand the pain of going under the knife just for the sake of beauty.

Crafted by Janelle Monae Q.U.E.E.N basically builds up the thoughts in the hypothesis of cyborg pronouncement by Haraway. In the video the sex character between the diverse sexual orientations are broken in the distinguishing proof hypothesis of the distinctive sexes in the general public. It is seen that the distinctive aspects identifying with the general work of the affirmation of the goals in the general public. One of the significant issues in this setting is the diverse viewpoints identifying with the distinctive societal settings. The cyborg, as she characterizes it, is a relevant allegory for the verifiable presumptions which manage her main goal. The cyborg is both a result of social reality and of fictionalized encryption (Haraway and Wolfe 2016.). The cyborg displays a being of office which can possibly reasonably amass political encounters outside of the legends of the first Garden, where lady is viewed as a body with a natural and instinctive handle of Nature. It does as such as an incorporated animal whose extremely nearness throws conventional polarities into question. Three focal sets which the cyborg straightforwardly goes up against are the qualifications amongst human and creature, man and machine, and the physical and non-physical. Now, I might want to remark on how Haraway is endeavoring at the same time to depict and record the state of contemporary innovation. As we have seen in Andrew Pickering’s book on the parallels amongst human and material organization, the scientist¹s goals and her ability to inventively build what’s to come is a basic purpose of separation amongst human and machine. He sees symmetry and shared insincerity, yet not a strict fulfillment. In this sense, the cyborg of Haraway is a seriously sexual animal which can make its own conditions for presence. The polarity amongst man and creature in other built up methods of insight, for example, Buddhism and Hinduism (nonexclusive terms which aren¹t without their offer of conflicts as to significance and potential assortment), has been an issue of degree, not kind (Orr 2012). This just infers for a few centuries people have had a world view which didn’t really depict sharp differences amongst man and creature. I say this to point to a verifiable move by Haraway. By her demonstration of translating current and generally conspicuous social structures however the development of a cyborg, she is endeavoring to make a coordinated and connected with awareness. She organizes the legend of monetary hypothesis (her homework economy investigation) by arranging the conceivable disintegration of divisions as an auxiliary accomplishment of contemporary mechanical powers. The cyborg is the central unit for a beginning legend, which as Haraway demands, is permeated with the temporality of a perfect world past the direct and fractionalized totality of Aristotelian teleology. The cyborg isn’t a look for another discontinuity, or of making another division, however a natural procedure that has all the lack of concern of transformative improvement inside a muddled and dynamic framework.

The significance of fantasy to Haraway consolidates both her confidence in the cyborg as an anecdotal component that states the ability to characterize cognizance and its association with the advancement of social conditions which uncover the shortcomings and availability of past philosophies. This social wonder, the homework economy, in which the work compel is ending up progressively feminized and destabilized, is a potential reason for coordinated effort. Character has both truly and innovatively moved toward becoming “opposing, incomplete, and vital.” Her comprehension of science as a formal epitome of unexpected social practices is here a helpful similitude for looking at the logic of an eminent and liminal space for aggregate personality. The cyborg is our metaphysics; it gives us our governmental issues (Reeve 2012.). The cyborg is a consolidated picture of both creative ability and material reality, the two joined focuses organizing any probability of chronicled change. In the conventions of “Western” science and legislative issues—the custom of supremacist, male-overwhelming private enterprise; the custom of advance; the custom of the appointment of nature as asset for the creations of culture; the custom of generation of the self from the reflections of the other—the connection amongst creature and machine has been an outskirt war. The stakes in the outskirt war have been the domains of creation, generation, and creative ability.

References

Andreasson, J. and Johansson, T., 2014. The global gym: Gender, healthcare and pedagogies. Springer.

Bradley, M.M., Costa, V.D. and Lang, P.J., 2015. Selective looking at natural scenes: Hedonic content and gender. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 98(1), pp.54-58.

Charter, R., Ussher, J.M., Perz, J. and Robinson, K., 2018. The transgender parent: Experiences and constructions of pregnancy and parenthood for transgender men in Australia. International Journal of Transgenderism, pp.1-14.

Feldberg, D., 2017. Fertility Treatment and Preservation in Transgender Men and Women. In Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine (Third Edition) (pp. 61-67).

Felkar, V., 2012. Marginalized muscle: Transgression and the female bodybuilder. Ignite: Undergraduate Journal for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice, 4(1), pp.40-49.

Haraway, D.J. and Wolfe, C., 2016. Manifestly Haraway. University of Minnesota Press.

Hunt, S., 2016. Transgendering Christianity: Gender-Variant Christians as Visionaries. In Contemporary Christianity and LGBT Sexualities (pp. 105-120). management.

Ohlsen, G., van Zoest, W. and van Vugt, M., 2013. Gender and facial dominance in gaze cuing: Emotional context matters in the eyes that we follow. PloS one, 8(4), p.e59471.

Orr, J., 2012. Materializing a Cyborg’s Manifesto. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40(1), pp.273-280.

Reeve, D., 2012. Cyborgs, cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the contribution of Haraway to disability studies. In Disability and Social Theory (pp. 91-111). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Soussignan, R., Chadwick, M., Philip, L., Conty, L., Dezecache, G. and Grèzes, J., 2013. Self-relevance appraisal of gaze direction and dynamic facial expressions: Effects on facial electromyographic and autonomic reactions. Emotion, 13(2), p.330.

Steinbock, E., 2014. Photographic Flashes: On Imaging Trans Violence in Heather Cassils’ Durational Art. Photography and Culture, 7(3), pp.253-268.