Discuss About The Responsible When A Self Driving Car Crashes.
The purpose of this essay is to analyse a situation on virtue of four classical ethical techniques. This essay will discuss the positive and the negative impacts of using driverless cars. One of the self-driving Google cars, a modified Lexus SUV crashed with a bus. The self driving car having detected a pile of sandbags tried to avoid it and thus moved to the centre of the lane (Iozzio, 2016). This resulted in the car crashing with a bus coming from the opposite direction. Therefore, with an aim of avoiding an accident, the self driver caused management major accident. This leads to the ethical question, whether it is safe to use driverless cars or self driving cars in roads. Furthermore, it is not the case that the test driver of Lexus did not see the bus, it thought that the bus driver will slow down to let the SUV continue. Therefore the fact is that, the major reason of the accident is the judgmental error of the driverless car. The following paragraphs analyses this situation on basis of four classical ethical theories, which are Utilitarian theory, Deontological theory, Virtue theory and Contract theory (Bonnefon, Shariff & Rahwan, 2015).
A self driving Google SUV caused a crash near Mountain View, Calif in order to avoid a pile of sand bags that it had detected. The accident was caused since the car move to the centre of the lane in order to avoid the sand bags. Due to this, it crashed with a bus coming from the opposite direction. Even after noticing the bus, the SUV did not try to avoid the accident as it thought that the bus driver will slow down. Therefore it becomes very essential to evaluate whether the use of driverless cars safe for its passengers or other vehicles or not.
Although this crash is not the project’s first crash, it is definitely the first crash that is caused by a nonhuman error. Most of the previous crashes that have been reported are mainly caused by rear ended human drivers not paying attention to the traffic lights. This accident however, sheds light in the looming gray area in the robotic future. The main question arises from this situation is that, who is responsible if the self driving car crashes? These types of accidents can definitely put a break to the use of the driverless cars (Goodall, 2014). Furthermore, it becomes very difficult to determine who will be responsible when a self driving car crashes. Be it a human driver, the driver could have been blamed or the car owner, but in this case, when a computerized driver replaces a human driver, is it allowed to blame the company that is manufacturing this car? (Litman, 2014) This situation is therefore analysed on basis of four classical ethical theories. The positive effect of use of driverless cars or automatic cars is that, it reduces the human effort by a considerable amount. However, the negative impact is that, it can increase the number of cases of accidents.
Theory of utilitarianism, deontology, virtue, and contract are four classical ethical theories on which the current situation will be analysed (Hayry, 2013). The theory of utilitarianism states that one situation will be ethical only if does good to a greatest number of people. Therefore, one situation will be ethical only if it is agreed by a larger group of people. The theory of deontology states that a situation will be ethical only if the actions associated with it is right irrespective of the rightness and wrongness of the consequence (Willis, 2014). The theory of virtue states that and individual’s character is the key element that is associated with the rightness or wrongness of a situation and that the individual’s character drives the ethical thinking (Lin, 2016). Lastly, the contract theory follows that if an action has a positive opinion of a major group of people, it is ethical. The current situation will be analysed on basis of these classical ethical theories.
Since the theory of utilitarianism mainly focuses on the greater good, this situation is completely unethical on basis of utilitarianism theory. This is because the self driving cars do not guarantee the safety of the passengers which should be the most significant consideration of any emerging psychology (Bonnefon Shariff & Rahwan, 2016). The use of the driverless cars can possibly risk the lives of many within seconds due to a wrong analysis of a particular situation, which has happened in this case as well. However, it might be the case that the bus driver is wrong in this case and that it should have slowed down. But both the situation risks human lives which is unethical. Since the use of such cars can risk human lives, utilitarian theory rejects the use of driverless cars.
According to the theory of deontology that analyses a situation on basis of the rightness or wrongness of the actions, this situation may not be unethical as use of robots in pace of drivers does not reflects any wrong intention. Furthermore, it is designed to make the human lives easier and therefore, it is not unethical. The main intention of using driverless cars is to lowering the human efforts and making their lives easier. It does not incorporate any wrong intention or action, although the consequences may be wrong. The wrong or nrgative consequence includes the accidents that can occur due to the ineffective decision making power of the robot driver. Therefore, according to the theory of deontology, the use of driverless cars is not ethically wrong
According to the theory of virtue, this situation is unethical since the test driver of SUV have analysed the situation in a wrong way. It had thought that the driver of the bus will slow down, and this analysis has resulted in the accident (Thierer, & Hagemann, 2015). The virtue theory is mainly based in the acquisition of good character traits from the individuals with the kind of habit they develop. The use of driverless cars does not guarantee the safety of the passengers as accidents in a number of cases is reported. Therefore, this implies a wrong decision making and thus the whole scenario of using driverless trucks is unethical. The positive impact of driverless car is although reduction of human effort, the driverless cars being the cause of accidents will not be accepted by Virtue theory.
Lastly according to the theory of contract, a situation is ethical only if it is accepted by a larger group of people (Hevelke & Nida-Rümelin, 2015). Contract theory analyses a situation from the perspective of certain contractual agreements between the individuals. One virtue of social contract model is that it gives a particular person motivation of being moral. Risking the lives of human can never be considered as moral. Therefore, in this case, since a self driving car is capable of risking human lives, it is obvious that a greater part of the society will give an opinion against the use of self driving cars, and therefore, this situation is unethical. The situation has a very less or little positive impact in comparison to the negative impact and therefore, the entire situation is unethical according to contract theory.
Conclusion
The essay tries to analyse a situation on basis of four classical ethical theories and answered the question whether the use of driverless cars is ethical or not.. It is a very difficult question to answer, who is supposed to be blamed if a self driving car crashes. The essay takes into consideration an example of a crash that involved a self driving SUV and a bus. The accident have caused mainly because the test driver of the SUV had thought that the bus will slow down, which did not happen in this case causing the car to crash. The test driver of the SUV although saw the bus coming from the opposite direction, it did not feel the need of slowing even after it was its fault to come to the centre of the lane for avoiding a pile of sand bags. The analysis proves that if greater good is considered, the use of self driver cars should not be promoted. The use of self driving cars can be promoted only if the analysing powers of these cars are improvised to a certain extent.
References
Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2015). Autonomous vehicles need experimental ethics: are we ready for utilitarian cars?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03346.
Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of accounting vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573-1576.
Goodall, N. (2014). Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2424), 58-65.
Hayry, M. (2013). Liberal utilitarianism and applied ethics. Routledge.
Hevelke, A., & Nida-Rümelin, J. (2015). Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Science and engineering ethics, 21(3), 619-630.
Iozzio , C. (2016). Who’s Responsible When a Self-Driving Car Crashes?. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/who-s-responsible-when-a-self-driving-car-crashes/#
Lin, P. (2016). Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In Autonomous Driving (pp. 69-85). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Litman, T. (2014). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 28.
Thierer, A., & Hagemann, R. (2015). Removing roadblocks to intelligent vehicles and driverless cars. Wake Forest JL & Pol’y, 5, 339.
Willis, J. E. (2014). Learning analytics and ethics: A framework beyond utilitarianism. Educause Review.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download