Discuss about the Execution Planning in Green Building Projects.
The following assignment is a use case diagram and description of the use case for the help desk system. The help desk comprises of supporters (first line and second line) that helps the customers for dealing with problems of their system like forgotten the password, need toner for printer, or program order for the system. The customers need the support for overcoming the problems and develop improved communication for help desk management.
The help desk system would be formed for the management of the existing facilities and the formation of the support to the development of the help desk facilities for the customers. The help desk is made for listing the support to the customers that are facing problem in their system development. The help desk is helpful for supporting the customers with the improved operations and functions of help desk system. The customers would have to request the help desk with their problems via emails. The email sent would be read by the supporters and they would have to deal with the requests. The request record is stored using request number, email address of the sender, supporter assigned to it, and the date of the request received. The supporter would be responsible for the taking the request, classifying the case, prioritizing the cases, and transferring it to others.
The various use cases of the help desk are,
Use Case Name: |
Send Request via Email |
Scenario: |
The customer would send the request via email for getting help desk support. The request via email would be done for ensuring that the customer gets the support from the help desk. |
Triggering Event: |
The customer gets the problem in operating their machines and hence they had to send request to the help desk via email for getting support. The problems act as the trigger for the event. |
Brief Description: |
The customer would be operating their system and suddenly they would face any problem such as forgotten the password, need toner for printer, or program order for the system. They would send the request asking for help from the help desk on the problem they are facing. |
Actors: |
Customers |
Stakeholders: |
Customer, Email Operator |
Preconditions: |
The customer should know the email of the help desk, Internet connection should be available for sending the email |
Post conditions: |
The supporters would receive the request mail from the customer to look up at |
Flow of Activities: |
CustomeràSystemàEmailàEmail ServeràInbox of Help deskàSupporter |
Exception Conditions: |
NA |
Use Case Name: |
Request Assigned to Supporter |
Scenario: |
The request sent by the customers would be assigned to a specific supporter in this use case |
Triggering Event: |
Request sent by the customer, Request look up by the supporter, and Email received act as the triggering event for the activity of request assigned to the supporter |
Brief Description: |
The use case of request assigned to the supporter would be helpful for the assignment of the request sent by the customer to the specific supporter. The supporter would have to read the email sent by the customer for getting the request assigned to them. |
Actors: |
Supporter |
Stakeholders: |
Supporter, Database Developer of help desk |
Preconditions: |
The email should have read by the supporter, the internet connection should have been working properly for receiving the mail, and the supporter should know how to handle the problem successfully |
Post conditions: |
The problem requested by the customer would be acknowledged, the supporter could deal with the problem, the request could be stored in the database |
Flow of Activities: |
EmailàSupporteràDatabase ServeràDatabaseàCustomer |
Exception Conditions: |
NA |
Use Case Name: |
Look up for the request |
Scenario: |
The supporters of the help desk have to look up for request as they are employed for dealing with the requests and problems of the customers. They look up over the various mails sent to the help desk by the customers for acknowledging the request mail |
Triggering Event: |
Sign up of the supporter with the email of the help desk, customer sent the email for resolving their problems, and supporter are available for resolving the request by replying to the mail |
Brief Description: |
The supporter would log in the email id of the help desk to find the request mail sent by the customers asking for the problem. The mail request would be viewed and replied by the supporter and the request would be assigned to the supporter |
Actors: |
Supporter |
Stakeholders: |
Supporter, Email Operator |
Preconditions: |
Sign up for the supporter would be available, the operator of the email would forward the mail to the mail id of the help desk, and the problem would be resolvable by the supporter |
Post conditions: |
The request of the customer would be reverted, and acknowledged. |
Flow of Activities: |
SupporteràEmailàEmail InboxàCustomer |
Exception Conditions: |
NA |
Use Case Name: |
Dealing with Request |
Scenario: |
The customer’s request would be dealt by the supporter with the variety of the operations available for them such as clarification, prioritization, and transferring them. The supporter would deal with each of the requests of the customer. |
Triggering Event: |
Sense of urgency for the resolution of the request by the client, availability of the supporter, and the data available on the request made by the client |
Brief Description: |
The request sent by the client would be analyzed by the supporter for prioritizing it then either resolving the problem or transferring the problem in case of the being unable to solve the problem |
Actors: |
Supporter |
Stakeholders: |
Supporter, Help Desk |
Preconditions: |
Information required for the resolution of the problem would be available for the supporter, the options for prioritizing, clarifying, and resolving the problem would be available for the supporter |
Post conditions: |
The problem would be resolved or transferred to any other supporter for being resolved, the request would be closed after the completion of the request |
Flow of Activities: |
SupporteràHelp DeskàDatabaseàServeràCustomer |
Exception Conditions: |
NA |
Use Case Name: |
Closes the Request |
Scenario: |
The supporter would close the request after completion of the request and resolving the problem of the customer |
Triggering Event: |
Completion of the resolution of the problem request by the customer |
Brief Description: |
The customer facing the problem would get the proper solution of the problem by the supporter and it would mark the end of the request by the supporter |
Actors: |
Supporter |
Stakeholders: |
Supporter, Customer |
Preconditions: |
Problem of the customer would be resolved |
Post conditions: |
Customer would be able to work on its system as usual |
Flow of Activities: |
SupporteràEmailàServeràCustomeràEmailàSupporteràDatabase Server |
Exception Conditions: |
NA |
Use Case Name: |
Request Stored |
Scenario: |
The request sent by the customer would be stored in the database of the help desk with the help of the improved database administrator. The request sent by the customers would be stored in the database of the help desk for further use. |
Triggering Event: |
Request sent by the customer for solving the issue they were facing in their system |
Brief Description: |
The request for modification would be stored by the request number, email address of the sender, supporter assigned to it, and the date of the request received. |
Actors: |
Supporter |
Stakeholders: |
Supporter, Customer |
Preconditions: |
Mail should be sent by the customer and the database must be ready for storing the information |
Post conditions: |
The request would be saved in a specific database that can be accessed at anytime |
Flow of Activities: |
CustomeràMailàDatabase ServeràSupporter |
Exception Conditions: |
NA |
DefectID |
Defect Name |
Defect Description |
Severity |
Priority |
Date |
Unique ID |
Location – Issue Type – Issue |
See ppt. |
See ppt. |
Date of inspection |
|
1 |
All headings |
In all the headings used for the report, there is no numbering present |
2 |
4 |
4/04/2018 |
2 |
First Use Case description of Email Issue |
In the use case description of email issue, the font colour used is white, where as rest of the use case description name is in black. |
3 |
1 |
4/04/2018 |
3 |
Use Case Diagram |
The diagram made does not show the direction of flow of activities is not shown |
3 |
1 |
4/04/2018 |
4 |
Use Case Diagram |
The heading of the figure of use case does not points out the figure number and source that is required for a formal report |
2 |
4 |
4/04/2018 |
5 |
Header Section of all pages |
The assignment made does not consists of any header in all of the pages |
3 |
1 |
4/04/2018 |
6 |
In the Table of contents |
The font used for the heading table of contents is Calibri light in blue colour whereas the rest of the table of content is in Calibri body in black ink |
3 |
4 |
4/04/2018 |
7 |
Brief Description Section of Use Case Description |
In the use case description, the section of brief description is stated in only one line instead of describing the use case activities |
2 |
1 |
4/04/2018 |
8 |
Actors Description section of Email Issue use case description |
In the line of ‘the user is faced…’. Instead the sentenced should be ‘the user have faced’ or ‘the user is facing’ |
2 |
1 |
4/04/2018 |
9 |
Brief Description Section of Email Issue use case description |
the content of the section is vague and the sentence does not make any sense |
3 |
1 |
4/04/2018 |
10 |
Brief Description Section of Look up request use case description |
the sentence ends with ‘……look up transferred request’. Instead it should be ‘…….look up for transferred request’ so that the sentence makes complete sense |
2 |
4 |
4/04/2018 |
11 |
Scenario Section of Use Case Description |
In the use case description, the section of brief description is stated in only one line instead of describing the scenario |
3 |
4 |
4/04/2018 |
12 |
Appearance of table of contents |
The table of contents is not aligned to the page size and it is not appealing |
3 |
4 |
4/04/2018 |
Bandera, J. P., Marfil, R., Romero-Garcés, A., & Voilmy, D. (2018). A new paradigm for autonomous human motion description and evaluation: Application to the Get Up & Go test use case. Pattern Recognition Letters.
Farronato, D., Fumagalli, D., Asa’ad, F., Pasini, P. M., Mangano, F., & Rasperini, G. (2018). Failed Blade Implant After 25 Years in Function: Case Description and Histologic Analysis. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 38(2), e29-e32.
Glaser, F. (2017). Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: a framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis.
Hajri, I., Göknil, A., & Briand, L. (2017). A change management approach in product lines for use case-driven development and testing. In 23rd International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for software Quality (REFSQ 2017).
Hupont, I., Gracia, J., Sanagustín, L., & Gracia, M. A. (2015, May). How do new visual immersive systems influence gaming QoE? A use case of serious gaming with Oculus Rift. In Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2015 Seventh International Workshop on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Jamous, N., Hart, S. W., Volk, M., & Turowski, K. (2016, November). The I-ID-An IT Solution to Supplement Conventional Identification Cards: The Air Transportation Systems Use Case. In Enterprise Systems (ES), 2016 4th International Conference on (pp. 68-75). IEEE.
Krieter, S., Schröter, R., Fenske, W., & Saake, G. (2015, January). Use-case-specific source-code documentation for feature-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (p. 27). ACM.
Misbhauddin, M., & Alshayeb, M. (2015). Extending the UML use case metamodel with behavioral information to facilitate model analysis and interchange. Software & Systems Modeling, 14(2), 813-838.
Tiwari, S., & Gupta, A. (2015). A systematic literature review of use case specifications research. Information and Software Technology, 67, 128-158.
Wu, W., & Issa, R. R. (2014). BIM execution planning in green building projects: LEED as a use case. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(1), A4014007.
Yu, W., Zhang, W., Zhao, H., & Jin, Z. (2014, September). TDL: a transformation description language from feature model to use case for automated use case derivation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference-Volume 1 (pp. 187-196). ACM.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download