Improving Internal Communication In ACMA Organization: Strategies And Best Practices

Defining Business Goals

Question:

You will be required to write a Formal Memorandum Communicating your analysis of the People Management Issues involved in the Case Study.

Analyzing on the organization communication is extremely significant within an organization. To understand on the work as well as the organization in the current global environment, there is need to look at both at what exactly is taking place inside the organization and larger culture in which the business functions (Austin and Pinkleton, 2015). The aspect of communication enables the organization to commence a communication to develop awareness, comprehending along with appreciation the enterprise strategic goals, preferably which lead to the fulfillment of the needs of the business and the environment.
Communication is a vital management component to any specific given organization. Regardless of whether the purpose is within updating on the workers new policies, or even listening to the attitude for the employees, effective communication is the essential problem in an effective management (Austin and Pinkleton, 2015). For ACMA to be successful they have to have a comprehensive policies along with approaches for communicating with its constituencies, the employees, stakeholders in addition to the community at large. Understanding on how to improve communication within ACMA business entails planning along with categorizing the needs of communication (Bloom, Garicano, Sadun and Van, 2014). This is a significant aspect which helps the flow throughout an establishment. In this report I will carry an analysis on how to improve internal communication across ACMA organization which has been an issue they have suffered over some time now. This has been one of the major issue which has affected on the way the management as well as employee communicate, there has been barriers between them and when it has been addressed fully they will be able to perform better on their functions (Broadbent, 2013).

Efficient and a clear communication between the management and the employees is vital to a successful business. after all the employees are the best brand ambassadors, since they are the front line engaging with the customers, sharing your messages as well as helping the business to grow. For ACMA organization to establish a communication strategy, it is significant to have a strong grasp on the best practices for sharing information and also aligning on the goals on the organization wide level. Some of these best practices are not necessarily the be-all and the end-all of the internal comms, they are used as the guide for laying on the groundwork as well as understanding how the initial strategy will be able to scale alongside the growth of the company.

Utilizing Communication Blitzes

On the first thing when it comes on how to improve communication within this organization is to define and refine on the business goals (Bloom, Garicano, Sadun and Van, 2014). As with most of the business strategies, an effective communication when it comes to the workplace it all start with a strong plan (Coombs, 2014). It is important to determine it at the high level where you are now and where you intend to go next as an organization and then confirm that the plan with the stakeholders who are involved in the execution as well as maintaining on this communication strategy (Bovee, 2010). According to Bambu on their recent data report highlight that eighty percent of the workers usually want their employer to keep them updated in regards to the news in the organization and this information could help on their jobs and build relationship with their colleagues (Bovee, 2010). This shows that the business need to start thinking more strategically when it comes to the information which is needed to be served up to the employees, what cadence they should deliver and which method they need to deliver with. Some of the question the things that that the line manager and other management need to ask would be what would the internal communication strategy do to the organization? Which are the areas are working well, and what needs improvement? Which are the communications tools or even platform are available to the organization?

Answering on these questions would paint a clearer picture of what the organization intend to do when it comes to the internal communication strategy to accomplishing it (Goetsch and Davis, 2014). These goals serves as the blueprint when it comes to establishing of this strategy, growing and maintaining it over some time.

The communication blitz is amongst the proved approach with regards to communicating crucial communications successfully throughout business such as ACMA (Hislop, 2013). The individuals seeking to enhance communication within a business as well as improve on the engagement of the workers might use the utilization of this simple to operate process that should be pointed out depending on its practical oriented and evidence based aspect.
In the course of the significant project, especially when the things are changing, there is certainly usually an increase need for the ongoing communication to the workers (Hislop, 2013). When employing a continuous improvement initiative, to communicate useful is important to succeed. Communication blitz provides a proactive approach while relying communications to assist manage any specific change that is within an organization (Chang, 2016). In a company for example ACMA there are several project that are executed which requires a master plan that could include major tasks and milestones, along with a well-designed change management plan. The change management plan ought to incorporate an extensive communication plan. It is subset of communication plan that is a number of communications that is delivered face to face from the managers to the staff.

Measuring the Effectiveness of Communication

This method is very easy. The first thing is the fact the senior managers should develop the succinct, short message (Chang, 2016). They after that divide up the front line managers into equal groups. The senior managers subsequently head out into the function parts of supervisors, discusses on this message, seek out open discussion after which look for retention with the managers (Smidts, Pruyn and Van, 2001). This might be carried out individually or perhaps in small groups.
The next thing is that the front manager’s meets with their employees in small groups and deliver the same message. After a particular time frame, around two to four weeks, the leadership group interviews a sample of the hourly workers to find out they might determine they might explain on the message (Smidts, Pruyn and Van 2001). They then develop questions that are precise to the message which is delivered to ensure that there is certainly a regular approach to discussing with the hourly workers. The goal would be to have a minimum of 40 % retention, meaning 40 % of the employees can easily communicate on the message. After achieving 40 % or even a better percent, the subsequent message may be formulated and cycle begin again. This is illustrated from the figure below to show how the process is done.

Figure 1: The process of communication cycle.

The 40% is the minimum number of individuals who should have a strong understanding on the messages to make sure that the communications is getting through. This could improve on the likelihood of the changes when taking hold. When it comes to scoring of the retention, it is important to develop a matrix for the key questions as well as a list of employees who receive on the messages.

Figure 2: The diagram shows a communication matrix

It is important to document how well workers are capable of retaining the message. Talking to couple of individual to obtain a gut check is too subjective with regards to making certain that the messages was received well (Shockley-Zalabak, 2014). The utilization of this matrix could assist in ensuring the end result that is preferred has taken place (Den, Boon, Verburg and Croon, 2013). Whenever scoring on retention, there ought to be three levels of response which are expected these are; full recall, a few remember or maybe simply no recall. There are 2 people that are needed when conducting the review, the top site manager in addition to the project leaders. This requires two sessions, which are carrying the clipboard with the questions along with any specific additional information what one would love to leave with each individual that are interviewed (Cummings and Worley, 2014). An illustration, it is possible to analyze how this message continues to be kept and simultaneously communicated back throughout the evaluation. Reviewing the scorecard might reveal the advantages and weaknesses of the outcomes (Samovar, Porter, McDaniel and Roy, 2015). Reviewing of the scores of persons generally reveal the operator has a reduced understanding. Furthermore, review with the other operators have to be carried out to be able to evaluate if it absolutely was one person who forgotten on the content or if perhaps all the operators were missing on the main points (Chang, 2016). The totals across the bottom reveals that talking about “how long would this change take?” had the lowest score. This was not communicated evidently and it must be repeated. Every round of blitz must have a prudence call in relation to the requirements for the partial or maybe entire message which is to be repeated (Chang, 2016). Consequently, in this instance repeating the information around how long the change take will be important, however the new message in the round two might be new content.

It is necessary for one to avoid on the typical error with regards to organizational communications- this really is measuring the success of communication from the sender perspective (Grunig, 2013). In many of time the leaders generally believe that ‘we told them’ or even that we have communicated this in the meeting or maybe that we delivered the emails and even put the posters with regards to this message (Cummings and Worley, 2014). For most of time people generally believe that the employees got the message simply because they believe in their high confidence in the development of the message and channels which are designed in dispensing them. There are constantly opportunities with regards to improving an effective delivery channel of the message.
The effectiveness of communication need to always to be checked through conducting of the in person evaluations with the hourly workers, seek to know how much might be recalled. This may have a multiple optimistic effects (Broadbent, 2013). The line managers have to be seen in the work areas, the senior managers should be following on the message and also depict on its significance, the employees have to also feel appreciated while they are asked these questions by the top leadership (Men, 2014). The supervisor should also feel valued by having a direct face to face time with the top leaders and the top managers end up understanding things which the workers and the supervisors come across to help them progress better . The cost of performing on the communication blitz is the leadership time. It is substantially more efficient to send an email and at the same time anticipate the staff to get the message (Cummings and Worley, 2014). The most effective technique is at the same time less efficient. Investment in time is really worth the return. How many times has the big change been thrown out with much minimum training and poor communication? When the efficient techniques are used, the outcome scanty are at best.

To enable ACMA organization employees and managers to communicate effectively the following are some of the recommendations.

Assess of the communication level: it is important for the managers to solicit feedback from the employees by asking them how well you communicate with them and if they have ideas when it comes to improving communication (Broadbent, 2013). Something such as one on one weekly meeting with the workers could help open on the communication lines.

Communicate directly: it is important for the managers to communicate something significant directly to the employees rather than other channels, to ensure they grasp on the message clearly. An example when the manager is displeased with an action of the employee or want to give a specific direction on how to accomplish a given task, it is important to deliver on the information yourself rather than send via an email or even a telephone call.

Requirement of a status report: It is important for the employees to be providing a weekly written status report, so as to enable one what has been achieved during the week and what have been planned for the following week (Broadbent, 2013). This would provide the basis for discussion on the weekly meeting and monitor on the progress of any project that are uncompleted.

Training: When it comes to communication, the line managers should never overlook the virtues of training. The improved interactions can be achieved when the team are given relative training. In training there are various courses which are available in improving the communication skills, which is aimed in improving the ability to deliver the message, inform as well as persuade. All the basic are usually covered, which include the verbal, written, the face to face, and giving the presentations.

Conclusion

ACMA organization has been encountering many issues within the organization, but one of the major issue is communication within the organization. When there is no effective mechanism for communication the employees and management would not work efficiently which could lead to many issue arising in regards to meeting deadline or even accomplishing various tasks. In this report I have provided evidenced based as well as a practical approach the organization could utilize to have an effective communication channel which will enable them to achieve their goals

References

Austin, E.W. and Pinkleton, B.E., 2015. Strategic public relations management: Planning and managing effective communication campaigns (Vol. 10). Routledge.

Bloom, N., Garicano, L., Sadun, R. and Van Reenen, J., 2014. The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. Management Science, 60(12), pp.2859-2885.

Broadbent, D.E., 2013. Perception and communication. Elsevier.

Bovee, C.L., 2010. Business Communication Today, 10/e. Pearson Education India.

Chang, J.F., 2016. Business process management systems: strategy and implementation. CRC Press.

Cummings, T.G. and Worley, C.G., 2014. Organization development and change. Cengage learning.

Coombs, W.T., 2014. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage Publications.

Den Hartog, D.N., Boon, C., Verburg, R.M. and Croon, M.A., 2013. HRM, communication, satisfaction, and perceived performance: A cross-level test. Journal of management, 39(6), pp.1637-1665.

Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014. Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson.

Grunig, J.E. ed., 2013. Excellence in public relations and communication management. Routledge.

Hislop, D., 2013. Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. Oxford University Press.

Men, L.R., 2014. Strategic internal communication: Transformational leadership, communication channels, and employee satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), pp.264-284.

Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E., McDaniel, E.R. and Roy, C.S., 2015. Communication between cultures. Nelson Education.

Shockley-Zalabak, P., 2014. Fundamentals of organizational communication. Pearson.

Smidts, A., Pruyn, A.T.H. and Van Riel, C.B., 2001. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management journal, 44(5), pp.1051-1062.