Innovation And Entrepreneurship Process Of Threadless In Chicago

Products, Target Market, and Value Proposition of Threadless

Discuss about the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Process of Threadless in Chicago.

Successful entrepreneurship lies upon the ability of the entrepreneurs towards effectively organizing and managing innovation in the business process (Galindo and Méndez 2014). This study will discuss the innovation and entrepreneurship process of Threadless in Chicago, United State. The study will provide a strategic summary of the organization through describing its products, target market, value proposition and competitive environment. The study will also explore the factor, which makes the organization innovative in the market. The study will also discuss the importance of the factor towards formulating the bases of competitive advantage of the organization. Apart from that, the study will identify the types of innovation dominating Threadless. Furthermore, the study will also demonstrate the ways in which Threadless organizes and manages the innovation. It will also highlight the importance or organizational initiatives towards achieving strategic innovation outcomes.

Threadless is an online community of an e-commerce and artists, which is actually based on Chicago, United State. The organization offers ranges of products like clothing, apparels, prints and many more. It offers highly fashionable design for its all products. Threadless has clothing and accessories for men, women and even babies. Among the men’s clothing, the organization provides T-shirts, raglans, tanks, sublimation, V-necks, hoodies, sweatshirts and many more. On the other hand, among women’s clothing, the organization offers T-shirts, tanks, sublimation, Deep V-necks, tri-blends, dolmans, long sleeves, leggings, sweatshirts, hoodies and many more (Threadless 2017). Among the kids, toddler and babies’ products, T- shirts and hoodies are famous. Apart from clothing products, Threadless offers accessories like i-Phone 8 cases, phone cases, drinkware, tote bags, hats, notebooks, zip pouches, beach towels, drawstring bags, sticker bags and others. Furthermore, the organization also offers gift cards, art prints, pillows, blankets, tapestries, rugs, duvet covers, framed prints and others (Threadless 2017). Apart from that, the organization also offers print collection on cats, funny, dogs, minimal, pop culture, outdoor, causes, horror and many more. Moreover, customers can get both online and offline availability of the products of this organization.

According to Sahut and Peris-Ortiz (2014), target market defines the market in which an organization wants to sell its products or services. Moreover, it is the target set of customers to whom an organization directs its marketing effort. On the other hand, Soriano and Huarng (2013) opined that a target market is separated from wide scale market a whole by analyzing the buying power, demographic and psychographic. While assessing the target market of Threadless, the organization serves only within the United State. According to Maclean, Harvey and Gordon (2013), Threadless is mainly popular within young generation customers rather than the older customers. However, it has targeted all teenage, adult, kids, toddlers and babies around the country. On the other hand, Edwards-Schachter et al. (2015) opined that Threadless has targeted the customers, who belong to middle to high income group families. Furthermore, the organization has targeted both male and female customers for offering their designer clothing and accessories. While considering the behavioral aspect, Huarng and Ribeiro-Soriano (2014) opined that Threadless has targeted customers, who seek some extra benefits from the organizations.

Competitive Environment of Threadless

According to Maritz and Donovan (2015), value proposition defines the unique value and promised value of an organization delivered and communicated to its customers. Moreover, unique value proposition differentiate an organization in the market over its rival organizations. On the other hand, Dino (2015) opined that value proposition provides unique reason to the customers towards choosing the products and services of a particular organization. While considering the value proposition of Threadless, it can be found that the organization has differentiated itself from its rivals in terms of its unique design of clothing, apparel and print. Furthermore, Méndez, Galindo and Sastre (2014) opined that the customers of Threadless get enough convenience in accessing its products both online and offline channels. Affordable prices of the products also add to the value proposition of the organization. On the other hand, Backman and Lööf (2015) opined that Threadless offers huge discounts and offers to the customers for their products in all categories.

According to Licuanan, Sengupta and Neelankavil (2015), competitive environment refers to the dynamic external situation in which an organization operates and functions. Moreover, the more are the sellers of same products and services in the marker, the tougher the competitive environment for an organization. On the other hand, Belz (2013) opined that highly competitive environment imposes competitive pressure on an organization, which raises the needs for differentiation. While considering the competitive environment of Threadless, it can be found that the organization faces highly competitive environment in the market. Moreover, Xu, Ribeiro-Soriano and Gonzalez-Garcia (2015) opined that Threadless faces tough competitive pressure from its direct competitors like Zazzle, ShirtFall and Design by Humans. Moreover, such competitor companies are also providing same types of designer T-shirts and other clothing to the customers. However, the unique design of the Threadless’s products has made it unique in the market from its rival organizations. Moreover, the attractive and innovative offerings and discounts of Threadless also make it innovative in the market.

According to Kavaliova et al. (2016), organizational innovation refers to the innovative business ideas, methods or practices, which make an organization unique from its rival organizations. Moreover, innovative organizations must have some unique attributes in their service or product lines towards providing unique value to the customers. On the other hand, Xue, Ding and Yuan (2016) opined that organizational innovation leads an organization to stand out unique in the market. Therefore, such innovation forms the basis for the competitive advantage of an organization. While considering the innovation of Threadless, it can be said that unique designs of the clothing, accessories and prints have made it innovative in the market. According to Simula and Ahola (2014) Threadless always provides customized design of the products to the customers. Moreover, the organization does not have own designers. They source the designs to the users and users create designs for various products. Furthermore, Majchrzak and Malhotra (2013) opined that the designs of Threadless are also selected based on the votes and scores provided by the users. In this way, the organization always provides customized and unique value to the customers through their high trendy and innovative designs of the products.

Types of Innovation Dominating Threadless

The custom clothing company Threadless has gained high level of competitive advantage through its innovation and customized design of the clothing, accessories and prints. According to Balka, Raasch and Herstatt (2014), the customers get unique value from Threadless through its innovative product design. Moreover, the organization also highly value for the money of the customers with its high quality and trendy designed products. Therefore, the customers have become highly loyal on the products of this organization, which can become the base of its competitive advantage. On the other hand, Dong and Wu (2015) opined that Threadless provides high level of value to the customers through engaging them in making design of the organizational products. In this way, increased customer value also adds to the competitive advantage of Threadless. It is also gradually increasing the revenue of the organization.

The innovation assessment of Threadless demonstrates that crowdsourcing innovation is dominant on it. According to Simula and Ahola (2014), crowdsourcing is a specific type of sourcing model in which organizations use contribution from the internet users towards obtaining the required business ideas. Likewise, Threadless sources the designs of clothing and accessories from its users over the internet and set them after getting approval from many other customers on the internet. Moreover, the organization also uses user ratings in which it asks the customers to rate the designs created by the users. Digit.hbs.org (2015) pointed out that Threadless selects the winning design for the product based the high score of the designs over the internet. Such innovation also facilitates the organization in saving their money in regards to designing and marketing. Furthermore, crowdsourcing innovation also gives the advantage to Threadless towards creating user generated value. Moreover, the design generated from the users actually meets the customized needs of the customers. In this way, the democratized innovation facilitates the organization towards gaining high level of competitive advantage.

Threadless also exemplifies the combination of crowdsourcing and user innovation types through their business process. According to Gambardella, Raasch and von Hippel (2016), user innovation refers to innovative products and services developed by individual users without any involvement of the producers. Apart from crowdsourcing innovation, the innovation process of Threadless is also quite similar to user innovation type. Backman and Lööf (2015) pointed out that Threadless uses user generated innovation in designing the products. Moreover, the organization selects the product design based on the approval of product design through the voting system of the product design over the internet. It enables the users towards providing unique product design to Threadless. In this way, the organization adds innovation to its business products and becomes able to gain competitive advantage over the rival organizations. Moreover, innovating designs from the users provide customized value to the customers, which enhance their loyalty level. In this way, the combination of crowdsourcing and user innovation dominates Threadless.

Organizing and Managing Innovation at Threadless

Threadless is one of the most popular crowdsourcing companies, which does not create designs by itself. However, it provides all unique and innovative designs of the products like clothing, print and other accessories. It effectively organizes and manages the implementation of innovation. According to Simula and Ahola (2014), Threadless sources the product designs from the users over the internet. Moreover, artists from around the world submit the product designs over the internet. The organization has exploded into huge design community, where nearly 100000 artists submit their innovative ideas for T-shirts. In this way, they get varieties of product designs for their products. The organization has sold millions of dollar of T-shirts simply by relying on the users and its fans to submit, choose and then purchase the wining T-shirts. On the other hand, Kavaliova et al. (2016) opined that Threadless has embraced the ideas of celebrity design, where the contributors in product design earn reputation for their design savvy.  Moreover, Threadless community and customers score each design submitted by the users based on its innovative attributes. In this way, the organization can effective understand customer preferences for their product design. It actually reduces the cost of the organization in terms of market research and marketing of products. Furthermore, the organization can always select the best and innovative design through voting system, which provides unique customer value. The organization selects the product designs based on the top score provided to the product designs by the staffs and community.

Digit.hbs.org (2015) pointed out that Threadless starts producing and printing the T-shirts and gift card and others only after getting approval of the product designs from the customers and community. New designs are selected for printing every week and the winning artists or designers are given profit share handsomely for their innovative designs. In this way, the organization manage to keep the talented designers encourages towards repeatedly submitting their unique product designs. In some cases, the designers also get big cash prizes for special themed design challenges. Threadless has apparently found unique ways of maintaining integrity of the community through encouraging the satisfying the designers, who have made the organization successful. Furthermore, Sahut and Peris-Ortiz (2014) opined that the products of Threadless are sold worldwide through online stores. However, the products are also sold in the retail stores of Chicago. In this way, the organization effective organizes and manages innovation in their business process.

According to Huarng and Ribeiro-Soriano (2014), clients are only satisfied once their demands are fulfilled, however often it is found that due to demand of trendy clothing, consumers are becoming quite distinctive in terms of their preferences. On the other hand, Balka, Raasch and Herstatt (2014) highlighted that diversification strategy often stands out to be cost effective towards meeting the customized client demands with regards to products. Therefore, an organization needs to make exclusive market research, data analytics and entertain customer response before launching products. Considering Threadless, it can be said that the organization has established unique strategy to understand customized market demand. The initiative through cloud sourcing has helped Threadless to understand market demand.

Most of the organizations try to establish niche marketing by using the social media or digital platform. However, Galindo and Méndez (2014) pointed out that advertisement and promotion are the core functions that are actualized trough digital platform. Therefore, for Threadless, strategic innovation has been established through digital platform where from client’s interest and direct intension is gathered. Also, the innovation can be considered as extremely perpetual for following years as well because a pool of users can be confined under directive platform to provide their responses for specific items which are yet to be launched. On the other hand, from organizational perspective, it can get the real-time response rate can set up the future trend for customized product availability in saturated market.

According to Huarng and Ribeiro-Soriano (2014), the product life cycle of an organization depends on how much it can extend the maturity level and this can only be achieved through intense marketing and strategic innovation. Threadless strategy has been to engage users for longer period as both the interest of clients and users are channelized through digital platform. Once the users post their customized design, those are voted by other users with course of time and eventually designs with maximum votes are manufactured. Such strategy is extremely beneficial for the organization as three aspects such as product design, market response and cost reduction for research are done simultaneously. This reduces huge time for introducing new products and therefore limits resource consumption.

Finally, it can be said that Threadless’ strategic innovation is quite sustainable as with the progress of time, cultural diversity along with nuclear families will lead to new customized designs, which will surely be appreciated by online users. Once the best design is considered, it is marketed, which is quite different and a trend setter for future. Such strategy will make Threadless to gain rapid market share in future.

Conclusion

While concluding the study, it can be said that Threadless is an online community and organization, which offers innovative design clothing, accessories, apparels and gift cards. The organization has mostly targeted young generation customers towards providing innovative and trendy fashionable clothing and other products. The value proposition of the organization lies in the innovative and unique designs of products. However, the organization is facing tough competitive pressure from its direct competitors like Zazzle, ShirtFall and Design by Humans. The innovative designs of the organization provide unique value to the customers, which make it to stand out unique in the market over its rival organizations. In this way, innovative product designs form the bases of competitive advantages of the organization. On the other hand, crowdsourcing innovation dominates Threadless, where the organization sources innovative product designs from the users. After getting huge source of product designs, the organization asks the staffs and community to vote the submitted product design. Moreover, the organization finally selects the innovative product design based on the high score obtained on a specific design. Moreover, the organization also effective organizes and manages the implementation of innovation through adequately sharing profit with the designers from the community. In this way, such initiatives facilitate the organization towards achieving strategic innovation outcomes.

References

Backman, M. and Lööf, H., 2015. The geography of innovation and entrepreneurship. The annals of regional science, 55(1), pp.1-6.

Balka, K., Raasch, C. and Herstatt, C., 2014. The effect of selective openness on value creation in user innovation communities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), pp.392-407.

Belz, F.M., 2013. Shaping the future: Sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship. Social Business, 3(4), pp.311-324.

Digit.hbs.org. 2015. Threadless: The Continuing Success of one of the older Crowdsourcing companies – Digital Innovation and Transformation. [online] Available at: https://digit.hbs.org/submission/threadless-the-continuing-success-of-one-of-the-older-crowdsourcing-companies/ [Accessed 12 Oct. 2017].

Dino, R.N., 2015. Crossing boundaries: Toward integrating creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship research through practice. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), p.139.

Dong, J.Q. and Wu, W., 2015. Business value of social media technologies: Evidence from online user innovation communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), pp.113-127.

Edwards-Schachter, M., García-Granero, A., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., Quesada-Pineda, H. and Amara, N., 2015. Disentangling competences: Interrelationships on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, pp.27-39.

Galindo, M.Á. and Méndez, M.T., 2014. Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work?. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), pp.825-829.

Gambardella, A., Raasch, C. and von Hippel, E., 2016. The user innovation paradigm: impacts on markets and welfare. Management Science, 63(5), pp.1450-1468.

Huarng, K.H. and Ribeiro-Soriano, D.E., 2014. Developmental management: Theories, methods, and applications in entrepreneurship, innovation, and sensemaking. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), pp.657-662.

Kavaliova, M., Virjee, F., Maehle, N. and Kleppe, I.A., 2016. Crowdsourcing innovation and product development: Gamification as a motivational driver. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), p.1128132.

Licuanan, V.S., Sengupta, K. and Neelankavil, J.P., 2015. Entrepreneurship and innovation initiatives among Asian multinationals: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 25(1), pp.67-83.

Maclean, M., Harvey, C. and Gordon, J., 2013. Social innovation, social entrepreneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), pp.747-763.

Majchrzak, A. and Malhotra, A., 2013. Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(4), pp.257-268.

Maritz, A. and Donovan, J., 2015. Entrepreneurship and innovation: Setting an agenda for greater discipline contextualisation. Education+ Training, 57(1), pp.74-87.

Méndez, M.T., Galindo, M.A. and Sastre, M.A., 2014. Franchise, innovation and entrepreneurship. The Service industries journal, 34(9-10), pp.843-855.

Sahut, J.M. and Peris-Ortiz, M., 2014. Small business, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 42(4), pp.663-668.

Simula, H. and Ahola, T., 2014. A network perspective on idea and innovation crowdsourcing in industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), pp.400-408.

Soriano, D.R. and Huarng, K.H., 2013. Innovation and entrepreneurship in knowledge industries. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), pp.1964-1969.

Threadless. 2017. Cat Piloted Cyborg. [online] Available at: https://www.threadless.com/ [Accessed 12 Oct. 2017].

Xu, Y., Ribeiro-Soriano, D.E. and Gonzalez-Garcia, J., 2015. Crowdsourcing, innovation and firm performance. Management Decision, 53(6), pp.1158-1169.

Xue, J., Ding, C.Q. and Yuan, J., 2016. The evolutionary game study of knowledge transfer behavior in cooperative crowdsourcing community of innovation. Advances in Modelling and Analysis A, 53(2), pp.164-175.

ccording to Sahut and Peris-Ortiz