Project Management: Tools, Techniques, And Strategies

Scope, Time, Resources, and Money: The Four Elements of Project Management

Discuss about the Analysis Of The Elements Of Project Management.

Project management can be defined as the most crucial tool that is being used for the successful business development by affecting the liabilities and revenues for the development of the effective customer satisfaction and retention (Schwalbe 2015). A successful project manager is responsible for the analysis of the four elements of project management namely scope, time, resources, and money. The elements are interrelated and the use of project management tools and techniques help in managing these four elements of the project. The scope of the project forms the inclusion of project size, requirements, and goals (Kerzner and Kerzner 2017). The resources are the amount of materials and the number of persons needed for completion of the project.

The following assignment is the study of project management and its various tools and techniques. The study is based on the role of project management for aligning the activities of project and form the advent of the development of the project operations for the achievement of the goals. The implication of the effective project operation development would result in forming the alignment of the activities favouring the study of project life-cycle phases, project management leading strategies, project financing and budgeting, project planning management tools, and project risk planning and management.

Schedule compression is the method of shortening of the project duration when required for achieving the final deliverable in lesser time. The scope of the project remains unchanged and it required making effective strategic decision required for the completion of the project. The schedule compression focused on the modification of the critical path of modifying the project is lesser time (Tomek and Kalinichuk 2015). The critical path of the project is the one defining the end date of the project and the activities of the critical path must be compresses for having an effect on the final end date of the project. The schedule compression can be done by two methods and they are crashing and fast tracking. These two method have been explained below,

‘Crashing’: Crashing is the method of completion of any activity of the project in shorter duration of time by adding some resources for the activities (Bakry, Moselhi and Zayed 2014). The crashing works effectively for all activities (critical and dependent) as it does not reschedule any activity but it gives the push for the completion of the project in shorter duration. An external resource or resources can be attached to the project activities for forming the activity completion is lesser time. The crashing in projects is done for aligning the implication of the operations favouring the utilization of the activities for forming the effective implication of the issues. Crashing of project involves the inclusion of the additional resources in the project so that the work can be completed in the least time. The deployment of the activities would also support the innovation of the operations favouring the alignment of the successive development. The activities of the critical path have zero floats and they must be crashed in order to get the final crashed schedule which is lesser than the calculated time duration.

Schedule Compression Techniques: Crashing and Fast Tracking

The implication of the methods of crashing would align with the deployment of the successive implementation of the activities aligning the utilization of the improved technologies. The major problem with the crashing is that it requires additional resources and hence would increase the overall project budget. Moreover, the crashing is dependent on the resources and the failure of the resources would result in forming the problems of the project. Crashing is the strategy for finish of any action of the undertaking in shorter term of time by including a few assets for the exercises. The Crashing works adequately for all exercises (basic and ward) as it doesn’t reschedule any movement yet it gives the push for the culmination of the undertaking in shorter length. An outer asset or assets can be joined to the task exercises for shaping the action finishing is lesser time.

The Crashing in projects is improved the situation adjusting the ramifications of the tasks supporting the use of the exercises for shaping the compelling ramifications of the issues (Klusacek and Rudova 2015). Crashing of undertaking includes the consideration of the extra assets in the task with the goal that the work can be finished at all time. The organization of the exercises would likewise bolster the advancement of the tasks supporting the arrangement of the progressive improvement. The exercises of the basic way have zero buoys and they should be smashed with a specific end goal to get the last slammed plan which is lesser than the computed time length. The ramifications of the techniques for smashing would line up with the organization of the progressive execution of the exercises adjusting the usage of the enhanced innovations. The real issue with the Crashing is that it requires extra assets and subsequently would build the general undertaking spending plan. In addition, the Crashing is reliant on the assets and the disappointment of the assets would bring about framing the issues of the task.

‘Fast tracking’: Fast tracking is the method of schedule compression that works by applying on the various activities of the project and make them work simultaneously instead of working separately (Nojedehi and Nasirzadeh 2017). The linear and sequential project durations works in a straight line where each of the activities works one after another. It is time consuming as the other activities of the project have to wait for initiation until its predecessor has been completed. The fast tracking works on such situation and forms the alignment of the activities favouring the utilization of the effective operation development. The implementation of the effective development of the activities can support the employment of the operations for listing the utilization of the rearranging the schedule. Optimizing is the strategy for plan pressure that works by applying on the different exercises of the project and influence them to work all the while as opposed to working independently. The direct and successive undertaking terms works in a straight line where every one of the exercises works in a steady progression. It is tedious as alternate exercises of the task need to sit tight for start until the point that its ancestor has been finished.

Crashing

According to Nojedehi and Nasirzadeh (2017), the optimizing chips away at such circumstance and structures the arrangement of the exercises supporting the use of the viable activity improvement. The execution of the successful advancement of the exercises can bolster the work of the tasks for posting the usage of the revising the timetable. The exercises can cover each other and decrease the measure of time required for the finishing of the undertaking. The arrangement of the exercises would bring about framing the issues of deferral and abundance utilization of time. Be that as it may, the covering of the exercises would help in diminishing the general time required for the fruition of the exercises. The main issue of the optimizing is that the exercises can’t be covered because of quality of straight conditions. The steady working condition can be useful for accomplishing the work to be done sooner than anticipated. The tasks of quick track would work progressively for the ramifications of the exercises supporting the arrangement of the last undertaking deliverable. The activities can overlap each other and reduce the amount of time required for the completion of the project. The alignment of the activities would result in forming the problems of delay and excess consumption of time. However, the overlapping of the activities would help in decreasing the overall time required for the completion of the activities. The only problem of the fast tracking is that the activities cannot be overlapped due to presence of linear dependencies (Klusacek and Rudova 2015). The stable working condition can be helpful for attaining the work to be done sooner than expected. The operations of fast track would work successively for the implication of the activities favouring the alignment of the final project deliverable.

Schedule Compression is the technique for shortening of the project term when required for accomplishing the last deliverable in lesser time (Hazini, Dehghan and Ruwanpura 2014). The extent of the task stays unaltered and it required settling on powerful vital choice required for the fulfilment of the undertaking. The schedule compression concentrated on the change of the basic way of altering the task is lesser time. The basic way of the project is the one characterizing the end date of the task and the exercises of the basic way should be packs for affecting the last end date of the undertaking. The timetable pressure should be possible by two strategies and they are slamming and optimizing.

Fast Tracking

The project lifecycle is divided into 5 phases namely initiation, planning, designing, executing, and closing (Kloppenborg, Tesch and Manolis 2014). The combination of these phases would tend to form the support and development of the final project deliverable. The implementation of project (construction or IT) should follow the implication of project management lifecycle for developing the plan of action and achieving the final deliverable from the project. The implication of the successive project lifecycle would help in forming the utilization of the operations for forming the innovative development of the final deliverable. The project plan development would be ease by dividing the course of actions in terms of project lifecycle (Parrott and Weiland 2017). The explanation of the project lifecycle in given in the following section,

‘Initiation’: The initiation phase is more of the information collection stage where all the required data for the project development can be collected (Chong and Hopkins 2016). The project initiation is done either by the client or the appointed project manager. The project involves the requirements of both human and materials and the phase is characterized by appointment of skilled human resources and accumulation of the materials. The human skills and materials are dependent on the work required to be done in the project. The phase would analyse the factors from various sources and form the final implication of the project deliverable.

‘Planning’: It is another major factor that would form the deployment of the specific course of action for the project. The implication of planning phase would involve the development of a project plan that would highlight the development of the factors for forming the alignment of the effective operation development. The plan development would also allow the implication of the schedule and persons involved in the completion of the project. The activities of the project are listed from the past reports and the requirements of the project where as the time schedule is presumed and estimated.

‘Designing’: The designing phase is characterised by the development of the effective design required in the project (Ghaffari, Sheikhahmadi and Safakish 2014). The final deliverable for the project can be achieved by the utilization of design developed in this phase. The designing phase holds an integral role in IT project development. The design of the application, software, or webpage would play a significant role for the development of the improved effective operation. The design development would be favoured by the implication of the effective integration of technology and the utilization of the operations favouring the processing of the software required for the project.

Project Lifecycle Phases: Initiation, Planning, Designing, Executing, and Closing

‘Execution’: The execution of the project activities involves the use of the plan and design developed in the earlier stages for forming the final deliverable for the project. The execution of the project plan would be based on the alignment of the operations and formation of the improved operation development for the final deliverable for the project (Love et al. 2015). The execution of the project plan would be based on the implication of the activities favouring the utilization of the information processing the implication of the final project deliverable. The completion of the execution phase would result in forming the development of the final project deliverable.

‘Closure’: The closure phase would involve the implication of the final reports and ending the project team (Cleden 2017). The completion of the project plan would be eased for the utilization of the final deliverable. The phase is basically characterized by the inspection and testing for the quality of the final deliverable. The closure of the project would be eased for forming the utilization of the successive deployment of the functions for forming the closure of the project. The deployment of the effective management of the operations would also be helpful for listing the utilization of the operations in forming the utilization of the successive activity development.

The leading strategies signify the implication of the operations favouring the implication of the effective leading of the operations for change implication process (Binder 2016). The leading strategies in project management are carried on for using the modification of the activities favouring the utilization of the operations for implying the changes in the project. The implication of the leading strategies is supported by the use of the effective implicational operations. The considerations of the external factors for supporting the implication of the operations would be eased for the development of the functions favouring the utilization of the leading strategies in project. The external factors like industry competition, economic condition, regulatory, environment, social, and opportunities & threats are responsible for shaping the leading strategies for forming the support to the organization (Serra and Kunc 2015). The internal factors like strength and weaknesses, competence, management ambition, risk attitude, ethics and philosophy, and corporation culture & shared values.

The implication of the effective strategies would allow the implication of the successive deployment of the operations (Schwalbe 2015). The managerial components like Configuring work environment & corporate culture to fit strategy, Design reliable Information & operating systems, Push for continuous improvements, Implementing incentives & rewards to key achievements, Exercising strategic leadership to drive strategy ahead, Establish strategy supportive policies & procedures, Adequate resource allocation to strategy-critical tasks, and Building sustainable competencies & capabilities are included for the strategy implementation. There are four types of leadership types that would form the implementation of the strategies in the project (Kerzner and Kerzner 2017). The visionary type, directive type, incubating type, and collaborative type of the strategic leadership can be used for the implication of the effective leadership strategies for the project.

Initiation

The project financing provides the advantage of off balance sheet for the project and it helps in shifting the project risks to the creditors for the exchange of high rate of returns to the lender instead of normal corporate lending (McDaid and Park 2016). The typical structure for project financial operations is based on the option of build, operate, and transfer (BOT). The structure is deployed for carrying out the project as the sole project aim. The project financing would allow the shareholders for project liabilities and financing off balance sheet. The project forms the off sheet financing for its project while carefully following the accountancy rules and law (Vammalle, Rivadeneira and James 2018). The resource financing allow the users with the effective full recourse to assets and cash flow of the shareholders for repaying the implication of the effective operation development. The project often fails to provide the lenders for the repayment of the required operation development. The financing of the project is supported by the deployment of the effective information processing (Cashin et al. 2017). The alignment of the non-resource financing would be deployed for listing the development of the operations and provide effective implementation of the operational development.

The project budgeting would be helpful for forming the utilization of the successive activities of forming the implementation of the resource in a specific way so that the overall cost of the project might result in forming the implication of the successive operational development (World Health Organization 2017). The budget for the implication of the project is formed for using the successive information processing. The development of the project budget would enable the calculation of the simplified costs and it would be calculated based on the individual activities or the work packages in total. The budget in the project is represented by the approved cost baseline and it would also be helpful for the formation of the successive integration and development. According to Vammalle, Rivadeneira and James (2018), the development of the information for project budget would be implied for using the successive information processing. The approved project budget is the tool that drives the project funding and it would pass the information of providing the utilization of the funds in the project. The project cost budget would be developed for aligning the organizational policies, guidelines, and procedures. The preparation of cost budget would include the estimation of the activity costs, calculation of basis of estimation, schedule for the project, scope baseline, and resource calendar (Kuo and Cheng 2018). The cost baseline is developed for the inclusion of the detailed budget and the implementation of the baseline for the implementation of the activities.

Planning

The project planning management tools would be implied for the implementation of the activities and it would also be helpful for utilizing the implication of the effective operation development (Thunis et al. 2016). The project planning is another major factor that would form the deployment of the specific course of action for the project. The implication of planning phase would involve the development of a project plan that would highlight the development of the factors for forming the alignment of the effective operation development. The plan development would also allow the implication of the schedule and persons involved in the completion of the project. The activities of the project are listed from the past reports and the requirements of the project where as the time schedule is presumed and estimated. The various planning tools are given below,

Tools	Description
Problem/Solution Tree Analysis	Problem Tree analysis is developed for the implication of the operations and it would align with the development of the activities favouring the implication of the situational problem solutions. The problems can be broken down into the implication of the activities for favouring the implication of the operations (Lowe et al. 2017). The problems are broken into smaller chunks so that the problems can be sorted out easily. It also help in enabling the prioritization of the problems and focusing the project in clear and concise objectives.  The identification of the constituent and arguments would also be resulted to form the implication of the effective operation development. It can be helpful for the implementation of the further information processing.
Objective Tree Analysis	The objective tree analysis would be aligned for the utilization of the project planning methodologies and it would also be helpful for the implication of the analysis and graphical representation of the project objectives. The objectives can be broken down into the implication of the activities for favouring the implication of the operations (Tunesi, Baroni and Boarini 2016). The objectives are broken into smaller chunks so that the objectives can be sorted out easily. It also helps in enabling the prioritization of the objectives and focusing the project in clear and concise goal.  The identification of the constituent and arguments would also be resulted to form the implication of the effective operation development. It can be helpful for the implementation of the further information processing.
Logical Framework	The logframe is the matrix representation of the results of stakeholders, objectives, problems, and strategy analysis for the preparation of the planning, implementing, and evaluating the action plan specification (Agugiaro 2016). The logical checks in the project would result in forming the monitoring and design for the output of the project implementation. The logframe would result in forming the implementation issues for the deployment of the successive integration of the assumptions and interventions.

According to Li (2014), risk management holds an integral role for the alignment of the operations and it would also be helpful for forming the implication of the successive development of the activities supporting the deployment of the operations. The risk management works successfully for forming the implication of the effective operation development. The analysis had helped in covering the implication of the operations that have been facing the issues and risks. The risk planning and management focuses on the development of the mitigation factors for the risks that have negative impact on the operations of the project. The implementation of the effective risk management plan would tend to form the implication of the strategies that are capable for the deployment of the risk mitigation in the organization (Rahman et al. 2016). The risk planning and management includes the identification of the risk, development of risk avoidance, mitigation strategies of the risk factors, and implementation. The risk can be identified into two broad categories of positive and negative risks (Hanson et al. 2017). The utilization of the risk management checklist would also be helpful for the implication of the effective deployment of the operations and it would also result in forming the key deployment of the activities.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that Project Management has been the most vital apparatus that is being utilized for the fruitful business improvement by influencing the liabilities and incomes for the advancement of the compelling consumer loyalty and maintenance. A task administrator was in charge of the examination of the four components of project administration in particular degree, time, assets, and cash. The components were interrelated and the utilization of undertaking administration devices and strategies help in dealing with these four components of the task. The extent of the project framed the consideration of task size, prerequisites, and objectives. The assets are the measure of materials and the quantity of people required for culmination of the task. The completion of the report had helped in identifying the various project management tools and techniques that had been helpful for the alignment of the final project deliverable. The alignment of the activities had also helped in forming the utilization of the profitable development of the activities favouring the implication of the effective operation development. The analysis of the factors of the risk would also be responsible for the implication of the operations favouring the deployment of the successive integration management. The development of the project budget had enabled the calculation of the simplified costs and it had been calculated based on the individual activities or the work packages in total. The budget in the project had been represented by the approved cost baseline and it was helpful for the formation of the successive integration and development.

Designing

References

Agugiaro, G., 2016. Energy planning tools and CityGML-based 3D virtual city models: experiences from Trento (Italy). Applied Geomatics, 8(1), pp.41-56.

Bakry, I., Moselhi, O. and Zayed, T., 2014. Optimized acceleration of repetitive construction projects. Automation in construction, 39, pp.145-151.

Binder, J., 2016. Global project management: communication, collaboration and management across borders. Routledge.

Cashin, C., Bloom, D., Sparkes, S., Barroy, H., Kutzin, J., O’Dougherty, S. and World Health Organization, 2017. Aligning public financial management and health financing: sustaining progress toward universal health coverage. World Health Organization.

Chong, U. and Hopkins, O., 2016. An international experience on the evolution of road costs during the project life cycle. Transport Policy, 48, pp.60-66.

Cleden, D., 2017. Managing project uncertainty. Routledge.

Forouzanfar, M.H., Alexander, L., Anderson, H.R., Bachman, V.F., Biryukov, S., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Casey, D., Coates, M.M., Cohen, A. and Delwiche, K., 2015. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet, 386(10010), pp.2287-2323.

Ghaffari, M., Sheikhahmadi, F. and Safakish, G., 2014. Modeling and risk analysis of virtual project team through project life cycle with fuzzy approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 72, pp.98-105.

Hanson, R.K., Babchishin, K.M., Helmus, L.M., Thornton, D. and Phenix, A., 2017. Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological assessment, 29(5), p.582.

Hazini, K., Dehghan, R. and Ruwanpura, J., 2014. An evolutionary optimization method to determine optimum degree of activity accelerating and overlapping in schedule compression. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41(4), pp.333-342.

Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Kloppenborg, T.J., Tesch, D. and Manolis, C., 2014. Project success and executive sponsor behaviors: Empirical life cycle stage investigations. Project Management Journal, 45(1), pp.9-20.

Klusá?ek, D. and Rudová, H., 2015. A metaheuristic for optimizing the performance and the fairness in job scheduling systems. In Artificial Intelligence Applications in Information and Communication Technologies (pp. 3-29). Springer, Cham.

Kuo, Y.Y. and Cheng, M.H., 2018. Budgeting and financial management of public infrastructure: The experience of Taiwan. VALUE FOR MONEY, p.221.

Li, W., 2014. Risk assessment of power systems: models, methods, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Li, Z., Ma, Z., van der Kuijp, T.J., Yuan, Z. and Huang, L., 2014. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Science of the total environment, 468, pp.843-853.

Executing

Love, P.E., Liu, J., Matthews, J., Sing, C.P. and Smith, J., 2015. Future proofing PPPs: Life-cycle performance measurement and building information modelling. Automation in Construction, 56, pp.26-35.

Löwe, R., Urich, C., Domingo, N.S., Mark, O., Deletic, A. and Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., 2017. Assessment of urban pluvial flood risk and efficiency of adaptation options through simulations–A new generation of urban planning tools. Journal of Hydrology, 550, pp.355-367.

McDaid, D. and Park, A.L., 2016. Evidence on financing and budgeting mechanisms to support intersectoral actions between health, education, social welfare and labour sectors. WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Nojedehi, P. and Nasirzadeh, F., 2017. A hybrid simulation approach to model and improve construction labor productivity. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(5), pp.1516-1524.

Parrott, E.L. and Weiland, K.J., 2017. Using Model-Based System Engineering to Provide Artifacts for NASA Project Life-Cycle and Technical Reviews Presentation.

Rahman, A., Hasan, R.M., Agarwala, R., Martin, C., Day, A.G. and Heyland, D.K., 2016. Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool. Clinical nutrition, 35(1), pp.158-162.

Schwalbe, K., 2015. Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.

Serra, C.E.M. and Kunc, M., 2015. Benefits realisation management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), pp.53-66.

Thunis, P., Miranda, A., Baldasano, J.M., Blond, N., Douros, J., Graff, A., Janssen, S., Juda-Rezler, K., Karvosenoja, N., Maffeis, G. and Martilli, A., 2016. Overview of current regional and local scale air quality modelling practices: Assessment and planning tools in the EU. Environmental Science & Policy, 65, pp.13-21.

Tomek, R. and Kalinichuk, S., 2015. Agile PM and BIM: A hybrid scheduling approach for a technological construction project. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp.557-564.

Tunesi, S., Baroni, S. and Boarini, S., 2016. Waste flow analysis and life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems as planning tools: Application to optimise the system of the City of Bologna. Waste Management & Research, 34(9), pp.933-946.

Tunesi, S., Baroni, S. and Boarini, S., 2016. Waste flow analysis and life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems as planning tools: Application to optimise the system of the City of Bologna. Waste Management & Research, 34(9), pp.933-946.

Vammalle, C., Rivadeneira, A.M.R. and James, C., 2018. Financing and budgeting practices for health in Peru. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 17(2), pp.1-40.

World Health Organization, 2017. Aligning public financial management and health financing: a process guide for identifying issues and fostering dialogue.